Execution · Lateral Movement
T1072 — Software Deployment Tools
Adversaries may gain access to and use centralized software suites installed within an enterprise to execute commands and move laterally through the network. Configuration management and software deployment applications may be used in an enterprise network or cloud environment for routine administration purposes. These systems may also be integrated into CI/CD pipelines...
Investigate Software Deployment Tools activity in the context of Execution/Lateral Movement: confirm scope, affected host/identity, and whether it matches expected administrative behaviour before deciding this is benign.
Platforms
Linux, macOS, Network Devices, SaaS, Windows
Priority / status
high / draft
Evidence to collect
- Host or resource affected
- Account or identity involved
- Timestamp of the activity
- Related process, file, or network artifact
- Any preceding or follow-on alerts
D3-SBV · detect
Service Binary Verification
Monitor for Service Binary Verification indicators relevant to this technique.
Tooling: Defender for Endpoint
D3-SU · harden
Software Update
Apply Software Update to reduce this technique's viability before an incident occurs.
Tooling: Defender for Endpoint
D3-FEV · evict
File Eviction
Use File Eviction to remove the adversary's foothold once this technique is confirmed.
Tooling: Defender for Endpoint
D3-CF · isolate
Content Filtering
Apply Content Filtering to contain the blast radius once this technique is observed.
Tooling: Defender for Endpoint
| ATT&CK Technique | D3FEND Technique | Practical SOC Action | Tooling |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1072 Software Deployment Tools | Service Binary Verification | Monitor for Service Binary Verification indicators relevant to this technique. | Defender for Endpoint |
| T1072 Software Deployment Tools | Software Update | Apply Software Update to reduce this technique's viability before an incident occurs. | Defender for Endpoint |
| T1072 Software Deployment Tools | File Eviction | Use File Eviction to remove the adversary's foothold once this technique is confirmed. | Defender for Endpoint |
| T1072 Software Deployment Tools | Content Filtering | Apply Content Filtering to contain the blast radius once this technique is observed. | Defender for Endpoint |
T1072 Software Deployment Tools → D3FEND → SOC action
Investigation steps — Microsoft
- Review Defender for Endpoint / Defender XDR alerts and timeline for the affected host or identity.
- Check Sentinel analytics rules and incidents correlated with this technique.
- Review Entra ID sign-in and audit logs if the technique involves an identity or cloud resource.
Investigation steps — generic
- Confirm whether the observed software deployment tools activity matches expected administrative or application behaviour.
- Identify the host, account, or resource where the activity occurred and its business criticality.
- Check for related alerts before and after this activity to reconstruct the broader intrusion timeline.
- Real detection reference: "New EXE deployed via Default Domain or Default Domain Controller Policies (ASIM Version)" -- This detection highlights executables deployed to hosts via either the Default Domain or Default Domain Controller Policies. These policies apply to all hosts or Domain Controllers and best practice is that these policies should not be used for deployment of files. A threat actor may use these policies to deploy files or scripts to all hosts in a domain. This query uses the ASIM parsers and will need them deployed before usage - https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/sentinel/normalization'
Response actions
| Action | Risk | Automation safe | Approval required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contain the affected host or account | Medium | No | Yes |
| Collect and preserve evidence | Low | Yes | No |
KQL
0dd2a343-4bf9-4c93-a547-adf3658ddaec — New EXE deployed via Default Domain or Default Domain Controller Policies (ASIM Version)
let known_processes = (
imProcess
// Change these values if adjusting Query Frequency or Query Period
| where TimeGenerated between(ago(14d)..ago(1d))
| where Process has_any ("Policies\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}", "Policies\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}")
| summarize by Process);
imProcess
// Change these values if adjusting Query Frequency or Query Period
| where TimeGenerated > ago(1d)
| where Process has_any ("Policies\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}", "Policies\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}")
| where Process !in (known_processes)
| summarize FirstSeen=min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen=max(TimeGenerated) by Process, CommandLine, DvcHostname
| extend HostName = tostring(split(DvcHostname, ".")[0]), DomainIndex = toint(indexof(DvcHostname, '.'))
| extend HostNameDomain = iff(DomainIndex != -1, substring(DvcHostname, DomainIndex + 1), DvcHostname)
| project-away DomainIndex 05b4bccd-dd12-423d-8de4-5a6fb526bb4f — New EXE deployed via Default Domain or Default Domain Controller Policies
let known_processes = (
SecurityEvent
// If adjusting Query Period or Frequency update these
| where TimeGenerated between(ago(14d)..ago(1d))
| where EventID == 4688
| where NewProcessName has_any ("Policies\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}", "Policies\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}")
| summarize by Process);
SecurityEvent
// If adjusting Query Period or Frequency update these
| where TimeGenerated > ago(1d)
| where EventID == 4688
| where NewProcessName has_any ("Policies\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}", "Policies\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}")
| where Process !in (known_processes)
// This will likely apply to multiple hosts so summarize these data
| summarize FirstSeen=min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen=max(TimeGenerated) by Process, NewProcessName, CommandLine, Computer
| extend HostName = tostring(split(Computer, ".")[0]), DomainIndex = toint(indexof(Computer, '.'))
| extend HostNameDomain = iff(DomainIndex != -1, substring(Computer, DomainIndex + 1), Computer) 17f23fbe-bb73-4324-8ecf-a18545a5dc26 — Azure DevOps Pipeline Created and Deleted on the Same Day
let timeframe = 3d;
// Get Release Pipeline Creation Events and group by day
ADOAuditLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(timeframe)
| where OperationName =~ "Release.ReleasePipelineCreated"
// Group by day
| extend timekey = bin(TimeGenerated, 1d)
| extend PipelineId = tostring(Data.PipelineId)
| extend PipelineName = tostring(Data.PipelineName)
// Rename some columns to make output clearer
| project-rename TimeCreated = TimeGenerated, CreatingUser = ActorUPN, CreatingUserAgent = UserAgent, CreatingIP = IpAddress
// Join with Release Pipeline Deletions where Pipeline ID is the same and deletion occurred on same day as creation
| join (ADOAuditLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(timeframe)
| where OperationName =~ "Release.ReleasePipelineDeleted"
// Group by day
| extend timekey = bin(TimeGenerated, 1d)
| extend PipelineId = tostring(Data.PipelineId)
| extend PipelineName = tostring(Data.PipelineName)
// Rename some things to make the output clearer
| project-rename TimeDeleted = TimeGenerated,DeletingUser = ActorUPN, DeletingUserAgent = UserAgent, DeletingIP = IpAddress) on PipelineId, timekey
| project TimeCreated, TimeDeleted, PipelineName, PipelineId, CreatingUser, CreatingIP, CreatingUserAgent, DeletingUser, DeletingIP, DeletingUserAgent, ScopeDisplayName, ProjectName, Data, OperationName, OperationName1
| extend timestamp = TimeCreated
| extend CreatingUserAccountName = tostring(split(CreatingUser, "@")[0]), CreatingUserAccountUPNSuffix = tostring(split(CreatingUser, "@")[1])
| extend DeletingUserAccountName = tostring(split(DeletingUser, "@")[0]), DeletingUserAccountUPNSuffix = tostring(split(DeletingUser, "@")[1]) Escalation criteria
- Software Deployment Tools activity observed on a privileged account or critical system.
- Activity follows or precedes other suspicious behaviour in the same investigation.
- Automated triage cannot confidently rule out malicious intent.
False positive considerations
- Legitimate administrative or maintenance activity matching this pattern.
- Approved security testing or red team exercise.
- Known benign software producing similar telemetry.
# T1072 - Software Deployment Tools
## SOC Recommendation
Investigate Software Deployment Tools activity in the context of Execution/Lateral Movement: confirm scope, affected host/identity, and whether it matches expected administrative behaviour before deciding this is benign.
## D3FEND Mappings
| D3FEND Technique | Relationship | Practical SOC Action |
|---|---|---|
| Service Binary Verification | Detect | Monitor for Service Binary Verification indicators relevant to this technique. |
| Software Update | Harden | Apply Software Update to reduce this technique's viability before an incident occurs. |
| File Eviction | Evict | Use File Eviction to remove the adversary's foothold once this technique is confirmed. |
| Content Filtering | Isolate | Apply Content Filtering to contain the blast radius once this technique is observed. |
## Investigation Steps
1. Review Defender for Endpoint / Defender XDR alerts and timeline for the affected host or identity.
2. Check Sentinel analytics rules and incidents correlated with this technique.
3. Review Entra ID sign-in and audit logs if the technique involves an identity or cloud resource.
## Evidence to Collect
- Host or resource affected
- Account or identity involved
- Timestamp of the activity
- Related process, file, or network artifact
- Any preceding or follow-on alerts
## Response Actions
| Action | Risk | Automation Safe | Approval Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contain the affected host or account | Medium | No | Yes |
| Collect and preserve evidence | Low | Yes | No |
## KQL
```kql
let known_processes = (
imProcess
// Change these values if adjusting Query Frequency or Query Period
| where TimeGenerated between(ago(14d)..ago(1d))
| where Process has_any ("Policies\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}", "Policies\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}")
| summarize by Process);
imProcess
// Change these values if adjusting Query Frequency or Query Period
| where TimeGenerated > ago(1d)
| where Process has_any ("Policies\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}", "Policies\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}")
| where Process !in (known_processes)
| summarize FirstSeen=min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen=max(TimeGenerated) by Process, CommandLine, DvcHostname
| extend HostName = tostring(split(DvcHostname, ".")[0]), DomainIndex = toint(indexof(DvcHostname, '.'))
| extend HostNameDomain = iff(DomainIndex != -1, substring(DvcHostname, DomainIndex + 1), DvcHostname)
| project-away DomainIndex
```
```kql
let known_processes = (
SecurityEvent
// If adjusting Query Period or Frequency update these
| where TimeGenerated between(ago(14d)..ago(1d))
| where EventID == 4688
| where NewProcessName has_any ("Policies\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}", "Policies\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}")
| summarize by Process);
SecurityEvent
// If adjusting Query Period or Frequency update these
| where TimeGenerated > ago(1d)
| where EventID == 4688
| where NewProcessName has_any ("Policies\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}", "Policies\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}")
| where Process !in (known_processes)
// This will likely apply to multiple hosts so summarize these data
| summarize FirstSeen=min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen=max(TimeGenerated) by Process, NewProcessName, CommandLine, Computer
| extend HostName = tostring(split(Computer, ".")[0]), DomainIndex = toint(indexof(Computer, '.'))
| extend HostNameDomain = iff(DomainIndex != -1, substring(Computer, DomainIndex + 1), Computer)
```
```kql
let timeframe = 3d;
// Get Release Pipeline Creation Events and group by day
ADOAuditLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(timeframe)
| where OperationName =~ "Release.ReleasePipelineCreated"
// Group by day
| extend timekey = bin(TimeGenerated, 1d)
| extend PipelineId = tostring(Data.PipelineId)
| extend PipelineName = tostring(Data.PipelineName)
// Rename some columns to make output clearer
| project-rename TimeCreated = TimeGenerated, CreatingUser = ActorUPN, CreatingUserAgent = UserAgent, CreatingIP = IpAddress
// Join with Release Pipeline Deletions where Pipeline ID is the same and deletion occurred on same day as creation
| join (ADOAuditLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(timeframe)
| where OperationName =~ "Release.ReleasePipelineDeleted"
// Group by day
| extend timekey = bin(TimeGenerated, 1d)
| extend PipelineId = tostring(Data.PipelineId)
| extend PipelineName = tostring(Data.PipelineName)
// Rename some things to make the output clearer
| project-rename TimeDeleted = TimeGenerated,DeletingUser = ActorUPN, DeletingUserAgent = UserAgent, DeletingIP = IpAddress) on PipelineId, timekey
| project TimeCreated, TimeDeleted, PipelineName, PipelineId, CreatingUser, CreatingIP, CreatingUserAgent, DeletingUser, DeletingIP, DeletingUserAgent, ScopeDisplayName, ProjectName, Data, OperationName, OperationName1
| extend timestamp = TimeCreated
| extend CreatingUserAccountName = tostring(split(CreatingUser, "@")[0]), CreatingUserAccountUPNSuffix = tostring(split(CreatingUser, "@")[1])
| extend DeletingUserAccountName = tostring(split(DeletingUser, "@")[0]), DeletingUserAccountUPNSuffix = tostring(split(DeletingUser, "@")[1])
```
## Escalation Criteria
- Software Deployment Tools activity observed on a privileged account or critical system.
- Activity follows or precedes other suspicious behaviour in the same investigation.
- Automated triage cannot confidently rule out malicious intent.
## False Positive Considerations
- Legitimate administrative or maintenance activity matching this pattern.
- Approved security testing or red team exercise.
- Known benign software producing similar telemetry.
Generated by SOC Response Atlas by Basyrix.
Want to push this directly to Confluence? Upgrade to Basyrix Pro.
- /api/techniques/T1072.json
- /api/recommendations/T1072.json
- /api/d3fend/T1072.json
- /api/mappings/T1072.json
- /api/confluence/T1072.md
Example curl:
curl https://atlas.basyrix.com/api/recommendations/T1072.json Response:
{
"technique_id": "T1072",
"name": "Software Deployment Tools",
"priority": "high",
"status": "draft",
"version": "0.1.0",
"last_reviewed": "2026-07-23",
"generated_by": "SOC Response Atlas by Basyrix",
"tactics": [
"Execution",
"Lateral Movement"
],
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"macOS",
"Network Devices",
"SaaS",
"Windows"
],
"summary": "Adversaries may gain access to and use centralized software suites installed within an enterprise to execute commands and move laterally through the network. Configuration management and software deployment applications may be used in an enterprise network or cloud environment for routine administration purposes. These systems may also be integrated into CI/CD pipelines...",
"soc_recommendation": "Investigate Software Deployment Tools activity in the context of Execution/Lateral Movement: confirm scope, affected host/identity, and whether it matches expected administrative behaviour before deciding this is benign.",
"d3fend_mappings": [
{
"id": "D3-SBV",
"name": "Service Binary Verification",
"relationship": "detect",
"practical_action": "Monitor for Service Binary Verification indicators relevant to this technique.",
"tooling": [
"Defender for Endpoint"
]
},
{
"id": "D3-SU",
"name": "Software Update",
"relationship": "harden",
"practical_action": "Apply Software Update to reduce this technique's viability before an incident occurs.",
"tooling": [
"Defender for Endpoint"
]
},
{
"id": "D3-FEV",
"name": "File Eviction",
"relationship": "evict",
"practical_action": "Use File Eviction to remove the adversary's foothold once this technique is confirmed.",
"tooling": [
"Defender for Endpoint"
]
},
{
"id": "D3-CF",
"name": "Content Filtering",
"relationship": "isolate",
"practical_action": "Apply Content Filtering to contain the blast radius once this technique is observed.",
"tooling": [
"Defender for Endpoint"
]
}
],
"investigation_steps": {
"microsoft": [
"Review Defender for Endpoint / Defender XDR alerts and timeline for the affected host or identity.",
"Check Sentinel analytics rules and incidents correlated with this technique.",
"Review Entra ID sign-in and audit logs if the technique involves an identity or cloud resource."
],
"generic": [
"Confirm whether the observed software deployment tools activity matches expected administrative or application behaviour.",
"Identify the host, account, or resource where the activity occurred and its business criticality.",
"Check for related alerts before and after this activity to reconstruct the broader intrusion timeline.",
"Real detection reference: \"New EXE deployed via Default Domain or Default Domain Controller Policies (ASIM Version)\" -- This detection highlights executables deployed to hosts via either the Default Domain or Default Domain Controller Policies. These policies apply to all hosts or Domain Controllers and best practice is that these policies should not be used for deployment of files. A threat actor may use these policies to deploy files or scripts to all hosts in a domain. This query uses the ASIM parsers and will need them deployed before usage - https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/sentinel/normalization'"
]
},
"evidence_to_collect": [
"Host or resource affected",
"Account or identity involved",
"Timestamp of the activity",
"Related process, file, or network artifact",
"Any preceding or follow-on alerts"
],
"response_actions": [
{
"name": "Contain the affected host or account",
"category": "Containment",
"risk": "Medium",
"automation_safe": false,
"approval_required": true,
"tool": "Defender for Endpoint / Entra ID",
"notes": "Requires approval -- confirm malicious intent before isolating a host or disabling an account."
},
{
"name": "Collect and preserve evidence",
"category": "Investigation",
"risk": "Low",
"automation_safe": true,
"approval_required": false,
"tool": "Defender for Endpoint",
"notes": "Safe -- read-only evidence collection."
}
],
"queries": {
"kql": [
{
"name": "0dd2a343-4bf9-4c93-a547-adf3658ddaec — New EXE deployed via Default Domain or Default Domain Controller Policies (ASIM Version)",
"description": "This detection highlights executables deployed to hosts via either the Default Domain or Default Domain Controller Policies. These policies apply to all hosts or Domain Controllers and best practice is that these policies should not be used for deployment of files. A threat actor may use these policies to deploy files or scripts to all hosts in a domain. This query uses the ASIM parsers and will need them deployed before usage - https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/sentinel/normalization' (Source: Microsoft's official Azure-Sentinel Detections (MIT licensed).)",
"query": "let known_processes = (\n imProcess\n // Change these values if adjusting Query Frequency or Query Period\n | where TimeGenerated between(ago(14d)..ago(1d))\n | where Process has_any (\"Policies\\\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}\", \"Policies\\\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\")\n | summarize by Process);\n imProcess\n // Change these values if adjusting Query Frequency or Query Period\n | where TimeGenerated > ago(1d)\n | where Process has_any (\"Policies\\\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}\", \"Policies\\\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\")\n | where Process !in (known_processes)\n | summarize FirstSeen=min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen=max(TimeGenerated) by Process, CommandLine, DvcHostname\n | extend HostName = tostring(split(DvcHostname, \".\")[0]), DomainIndex = toint(indexof(DvcHostname, '.'))\n | extend HostNameDomain = iff(DomainIndex != -1, substring(DvcHostname, DomainIndex + 1), DvcHostname)\n | project-away DomainIndex"
},
{
"name": "05b4bccd-dd12-423d-8de4-5a6fb526bb4f — New EXE deployed via Default Domain or Default Domain Controller Policies",
"description": "This detection highlights executables deployed to hosts via either the Default Domain or Default Domain Controller Policies. These policies apply to all hosts or Domain Controllers and best practice is that these policies should not be used for deployment of files. A threat actor may use these policies to deploy files or scripts to all hosts in a domain.' (Source: Microsoft's official Azure-Sentinel Detections (MIT licensed).)",
"query": "let known_processes = (\n SecurityEvent\n // If adjusting Query Period or Frequency update these\n | where TimeGenerated between(ago(14d)..ago(1d))\n | where EventID == 4688\n | where NewProcessName has_any (\"Policies\\\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}\", \"Policies\\\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\")\n | summarize by Process);\n SecurityEvent\n // If adjusting Query Period or Frequency update these\n | where TimeGenerated > ago(1d)\n | where EventID == 4688\n | where NewProcessName has_any (\"Policies\\\\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04fB984F9}\", \"Policies\\\\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\")\n | where Process !in (known_processes)\n // This will likely apply to multiple hosts so summarize these data\n | summarize FirstSeen=min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen=max(TimeGenerated) by Process, NewProcessName, CommandLine, Computer\n | extend HostName = tostring(split(Computer, \".\")[0]), DomainIndex = toint(indexof(Computer, '.'))\n | extend HostNameDomain = iff(DomainIndex != -1, substring(Computer, DomainIndex + 1), Computer)"
},
{
"name": "17f23fbe-bb73-4324-8ecf-a18545a5dc26 — Azure DevOps Pipeline Created and Deleted on the Same Day",
"description": "An attacker with access to Azure DevOps could create a pipeline to inject artifacts used by other pipelines, or to create a malicious software build that looks legitimate by using a pipeline that incorporates legitimate elements. An attacker would also likely want to cover their tracks once conducting such activity. This query looks for Pipelines created and deleted within the same day, this is unlikely to be legitimate user activity in the majority of cases.' (Source: Microsoft's official Azure-Sentinel Detections (MIT licensed).)",
"query": "let timeframe = 3d;\n// Get Release Pipeline Creation Events and group by day\nADOAuditLogs\n| where TimeGenerated > ago(timeframe)\n| where OperationName =~ \"Release.ReleasePipelineCreated\"\n// Group by day\n| extend timekey = bin(TimeGenerated, 1d)\n| extend PipelineId = tostring(Data.PipelineId)\n| extend PipelineName = tostring(Data.PipelineName)\n// Rename some columns to make output clearer\n| project-rename TimeCreated = TimeGenerated, CreatingUser = ActorUPN, CreatingUserAgent = UserAgent, CreatingIP = IpAddress\n// Join with Release Pipeline Deletions where Pipeline ID is the same and deletion occurred on same day as creation\n| join (ADOAuditLogs\n| where TimeGenerated > ago(timeframe)\n| where OperationName =~ \"Release.ReleasePipelineDeleted\"\n// Group by day\n| extend timekey = bin(TimeGenerated, 1d)\n| extend PipelineId = tostring(Data.PipelineId)\n| extend PipelineName = tostring(Data.PipelineName)\n// Rename some things to make the output clearer\n| project-rename TimeDeleted = TimeGenerated,DeletingUser = ActorUPN, DeletingUserAgent = UserAgent, DeletingIP = IpAddress) on PipelineId, timekey\n| project TimeCreated, TimeDeleted, PipelineName, PipelineId, CreatingUser, CreatingIP, CreatingUserAgent, DeletingUser, DeletingIP, DeletingUserAgent, ScopeDisplayName, ProjectName, Data, OperationName, OperationName1\n| extend timestamp = TimeCreated\n| extend CreatingUserAccountName = tostring(split(CreatingUser, \"@\")[0]), CreatingUserAccountUPNSuffix = tostring(split(CreatingUser, \"@\")[1])\n| extend DeletingUserAccountName = tostring(split(DeletingUser, \"@\")[0]), DeletingUserAccountUPNSuffix = tostring(split(DeletingUser, \"@\")[1])"
}
],
"spl": [],
"esql": [
{
"name": "a8256685-9736-465b-b159-f25a172d08e8 — Suspicious Curl to Jamf Endpoint",
"description": "(EQL) Detects curl requests to JAMF Pro endpoints from suspicious processes like unsigned binaries or scripting interpreters. This indicates potential abuse of stolen JAMF credentials for lateral movement in enterprise macOS environments. (Source: Elastic's official detection-rules repository (Elastic License v2).)",
"query": "process where host.os.type == \"macos\" and event.type == \"start\" and event.action == \"exec\" and\n process.name in (\"curl\", \"nscurl\") and process.command_line like \"*https://jamf.*\" and\n ((process.parent.code_signature.exists == false or process.parent.code_signature.trusted == false) or\n process.parent.name in (\"osascript\", \"node\", \"perl\", \"ruby\") or\n process.parent.name like \"python*\")"
},
{
"name": "1ca62f14-4787-4913-b7af-df11745a49da — New GitHub App Installed",
"description": "(EQL) This rule detects when a new GitHub App has been installed in your organization account. GitHub Apps extend GitHub's functionality both within and outside of GitHub. When an app is installed it is granted permissions to read or modify your repository and organization data. Only trusted apps should be installed and any newly installed apps should be investigated to verify their legitimacy... (Source: Elastic's official detection-rules repository (Elastic License v2).)",
"query": "configuration where data_stream.dataset == \"github.audit\" and event.action == \"integration_installation.create\""
}
]
},
"automation": {
"safe": [
"Add recommendation as Sentinel incident comment.",
"Run enrichment queries.",
"Create ServiceNow SecOps task."
],
"approval_required": [
"Contain or disable the affected host/account.",
"Any change to production configuration."
]
},
"escalation_criteria": [
"Software Deployment Tools activity observed on a privileged account or critical system.",
"Activity follows or precedes other suspicious behaviour in the same investigation.",
"Automated triage cannot confidently rule out malicious intent."
],
"false_positive_considerations": [
"Legitimate administrative or maintenance activity matching this pattern.",
"Approved security testing or red team exercise.",
"Known benign software producing similar telemetry."
],
"confluence": {
"title": "T1072 - Software Deployment Tools Response Guidance",
"labels": [
"mitre",
"attack",
"d3fend",
"secops",
"basyrix"
],
"sections": [
"summary",
"d3fend_mappings",
"investigation_steps",
"response_actions",
"queries",
"automation",
"escalation_criteria",
"false_positive_considerations"
]
}
}